Pollack v. Pioche

35 Cal. 416 (1868)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

P leased premises to D and the premises were damaged by a torrent of water overflowing and sweeping through them. This was the result of unusual rains and their collection in a natural reservoir in the vicinity. The premises were damaged to the amount of $6,000. D got the judgment and P appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.