P and Larochelle made an agreement that Larochelle would allow P to install a jukebox on his premises for 14.5 years and that P and Larochelle would share the revenue generated at a 60/40 split. The contract recited that it was binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. D purchased the business with knowledge of the contract but decided to remove the jukebox from the premises. P sued D. The trial court issued a temporary injunction but that was dissolved, and the bill was dismissed as the trial court found that D was not bound by the terms of the contract. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.