See Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005) for the facts. On remand, the district court again found the defense of laches persuasive. It held that the seven-year, nine-month 'Romero Delay Period' evinced a lack of diligence on Romero's part. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.