The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

See Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005) for the facts. On remand, the district court again found the defense of laches persuasive. It held that the seven-year, nine-month 'Romero Delay Period' evinced a lack of diligence on Romero's part. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.