Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

On September 24, 1988, H and W were married. The parties separated on February 25, 2017. While the parties were married, they shared one joint bank account. The parties had a daughter who attended Sweet Briar College from 2009 until 2013. The parties' daughter acquired several student loans in her name, and H acquired student loans in his name. The loans H acquired were administered through Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc, and used by the parties' daughter for tuition, books, and living expenses. H contends that, although the Great Lakes loans were incurred in his sole name, the parties made a joint decision in acquiring the loans in question. The parties decided the Great Lakes loans would be in H's name only due to a discrepancy in the parties' credit scores. At some point, W's mother co-signed loan documents for one of the Great Lakes loans. The outstanding debt of the Great Lakes loans was $164,163.00 on the date of separation in 2017. The parties had used their joint bank account to make the payments on the Great Lakes loan. On August 5, 2019, W filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking a declaration that the Great Lakes loans were separate, rather than marital, property. The trial court found 'there is no genuine issue of material fact to be resolved . . . and that partial summary judgment should be instead entered in favor of . . . M declaring that the Great Lakes Student Loan . . . is marital property as a matter of law.' M was assigned 75% of the outstanding balance of the loans, and W was assigned 25% of the outstanding balance of the loans. W appealed. W contends the trial court erred in classifying the Great Lakes loans as marital property.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.