D owned more than twenty rental homes, and many of his tenants were low-income women who received Section 8 housing vouchers. In 2000, P, along with her then-husband and her four children, rented a home from D. P used a housing voucher to pay her rent. In 2002, P informed D she was eligible to move into a larger home. D drove P in his car to one of D's other properties. When returning in the car, D rubbed his hand down P's arm and said, 'Well, how do you like it?' P, her boyfriend, and her children moved into a different rental property owned by D, using a housing voucher to pay the rent. P's boyfriend moved to Louisiana to visit his ill father. D behaved inappropriately toward P on several other occasions. First, D had been inside the house without prior notice when P was not at home. P noticed her clothing was moved. D claimed he had to replace the screen on P's bedroom window. P's screen was not damaged and had not been replaced. D came to inspect while P was making dinner for her children. D stood very close to P and rubbed his genital area. D made an unannounced inspection at 9:30 or 10:00 in the evening P's fourteen-year-old sister was staying the night with her, and they were in their pajamas getting ready for bed. D followed P and her sister into a bedroom and then a bathroom, which made them feel uncomfortable. P and her sister were watching television, and D lay down on P's sectional couch after he completed the inspection. P had to tell D to leave 'at least three times' before he left. P also reported receiving phone calls from D at inappropriate times, sometimes as late as 2:30 or 3:00 in the morning. P met with her SCHA worker and reported D's inappropriate actions. P could not change the locks unless she gave D a key. P could get out of the lease without losing her housing voucher if D agreed to rescind the lease. D refused. P changed the locks on her door without giving D a key. D again showed up at the house when P was outside sunning. D asked questions about P’s sister’s maturity and then traced a scar on P’s friend’s back pulling the friend’s pants downward to see where it ended. P moved out, and D did not return her deposit. P filed a complaint with SCHRC, and the investigator verified the issue with other single women who received housing assistance as well. P sued D in the district court, alleging sexual harassment; sex discrimination; and coercion, intimidation, threats, and interference with P's rights, in violation of the FHA and the ICRA. P also asserted a breach of contract claim against for failure to return the deposit. D brought a breach of contract counterclaim against P, insisting P owed him unpaid rent and failed to leave the rental home 'in a clean and satisfactory condition.' The jury awarded P $13,685.00 in compensatory damages for the housing claims, $400.00 for Quigley's breach of contract claim, and $250,000.00 in punitive damages. D got nothing. The district court reduced the award of punitive damages to $20,527.50 and awarded P $20,000.00 in attorney fees and $1,587.88 in costs. Both parties appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.