The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P whose eighth birthday was on the day following the accident, was on his way home from a boxing lesson. The instructor had driven P and his brother to the street in front of their home, double-parking across from their home. The brother, who was a year older than P, ran across the street, followed almost immediately by the younger boy. P reached the middle of the street and saw D’s headlights, stopped, and then ran in an attempt to avoid being struck. D was unable to avoid hitting him. Plaintiff was hospitalized for several weeks and continued to wear a cast on his broken right leg for some time thereafter. P admitted that he had not looked before he ran into the path of the car. P knew he should check for traffic, he said that he had just forgotten. P admitted to having received some instruction on pedestrian safety, including the traditional stop, look, and listen. D alleged that P's own negligence was the proximate cause of his injury. The district court granted D's motion for summary judgment. P appealed contending that P lacked the capacity to be contributorily negligent. D contends that P was contributorily negligent as a matter of law because of violation of statutory requirements governing pedestrian conduct.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.