Reilly v. Highman
345 P.2d 652 (1959)
Facts
Lawrence (D) lives on Louisiana Street, and Highman (D) was engaged in removing a tree from Lawrence's yard. It fell into the street just as P's son drove by in P's automobile. It struck the car causing damage. P sued both Ds. P states that the proximate cause of the accident and damage was due to the negligence of the defendants. P claimed damages of $269.39 and costs. P also claimed that because it was intrinsically dangerous work Lawrence (D), was obligated to see that the work was carefully performed. It was not carefully performed in a workmanlike manner, and Lawrence (D) is also liable. Lawrence (D) demurred on the ground it failed to state a cause of action as to him. The demurrer was sustained, and P appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner