Rifkin v. Steele Platt

824 P.2d 32 (1991)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

This matter involves the sale of the controlling shares of the corporation, which owns a restaurant of the same name located in the Tivoli Shopping Center. Ps include the corporation and its present principal shareholders, Rifkin, Kernis and Kortz (buyers). Ps and Ds executed a Stock Purchase Agreement to effectuate the sale of the corporation. After closing, the Ps discovered inaccuracies in financial representations made in the agreement. Consequently, they filed suit against Ds asserting claims of breach of contract, breach of good faith, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. The complaint alleged that Platt, as officer and director, had misappropriated funds from it and that certain assets on the balance sheet were actually owned by Platt or other entities that he controlled. Ds counterclaim seeking rescission of the agreement. After a trial, a judgment was entered in favor of the Ps on the breach of contract claim and in favor of the corporation on the breach of fiduciary duty. The court also awarded attorney fees pursuant to the agreement.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.