P purchased a computer from Tandy (D) doing business as Radio Shack. P then filed an action for fraud, breach of warranty, and negligence in the purchase of the computer. D answered with a general denial of the claims and raised an affirmative defense of contributory fault. At the completion of the trial, the court instructed the jury that the law recognized a presumption against fraud and that presumption could only be overcome by clear and convincing evidence even though the burden of proof remains proof by a preponderance of the evidence. D excepted to these instructions. P won and D appealed. The Court of appeals affirmed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.