Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Luten Bridge Co. (P) contracted with Rockingham County (D) to build a bridge in North Carolina on January 7, 1924. A resolution was adopted on February 21st that the bridge contract was not legal and valid. A copy of this resolution was sent to P. Another resolution on March 3rd was adopted that any work P did on the bridge would be done at his own peril. At the time of the passage of the first resolution, P had expended about $1,900 for labor and materials. P ignored the resolution and built the bridge anyway. P then sued for the amount of the work ($18,301.07) and won a directed verdict. The judge excluded evidence offered by D to support its contentions as to notice of cancellation. D appealed: notice of the cancellation was given P before the erection of the bridge was commenced and that D was only liable for damages which P would have sustained if it has abandoned the construction project.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.