Roffman v. Trump

754 F.Supp. 411 (E.D. Pa 1990)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

P is an investment analyst who specializes in appraisal of the Atlantic City casino industry. He wrote an extremely bad but fundamentally truthful analysis of the prospects of the Taj Mahal casino that D was ready to open. Atlantic City was a dreary kind of place, and there is not enough business for the casino to make it. D threw a temper tantrum. D claimed that P's assertions in the article were an 'outrage.' D demanded that P issue a public retraction of his assessment of the Taj's chances for success, or, in the absence of such a retraction, that Janney fire P. The letter stated that D would institute a 'major lawsuit' against Janney if these demands were not met. D also stated in his letter that he had 'often thought of P as an unguided missile.' P bowed to the pressure and issued a retraction but retracted the retraction. P was fired by his employer Janney. D told the world that P is a man of little talent who disagrees with other people. - New York Post, March 27, 1990. P is mediocre, a man with no talent . . . . P was dismissed or was about to be dismissed six months ago, and I saved his job. - The Philadelphia Inquirer, March 27, 1990. [P] is a very unprofessional guy. He is a hair trigger. - Barron's, April 2, 1990. [P] got rid of a bad analyst, a man with little talent. He's not a good man. - Fortune, May 7, 1990. I think [P] is in total conflict. - Fortune, May 7, 1990 (said in reference to the fact that P allegedly owns stock in an entity that controls a casino that competes with the Taj Mahal). [P is a] disgrace to his profession . . . . I don't think P is a very good analyst. - Institutional Investor, July 1990. [D]: Here's a guy [P] that used to call me, begging me to buy stock through him, with the implication that if I'd buy stock he'd give me positive comments. [Reporter]: Are you accusing him of fraud? [D]: I'm accusing him of not being very good at what he does. - Vanity Fair, September 1990. P sued D for defamation. D moved to dismiss.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.