This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D alleges that Wachtell is in violation of the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct because D is both a current client of Wachtell and a client whom Wachtell has previously represented in matters substantially related to the instant proceedings. Dow argues that Wachtell never took steps to inform D that it was no longer a client following Wachtell's representation of D in 2007 and 2008 in connection with the termination of two D executives and potential defensive measures in response to rumors of a takeover bid. D argues that Wachtell obtained confidential information that will materially advance Rohm and Haas's (P) position in the instant litigation. P claims it should have been clear to D that D was no longer a Wachtell client when the firm appeared opposite D in its representation of P in the negotiations of the initial confidentiality agreement and the merger agreement in mid-2008. P argues that the nature and scope of the prior representation and the current litigation are distinct and that Wachtell received no confidences from D that could be used to P's advantage.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.