Rushink v. Gerstheimer
82 A.D.2d 944 (1981)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D drove an automobile owned by her husband, to a pharmacy located on the grounds of the Middletown Psychiatric Center. She parked the car in front of the pharmacy with the keys in the ignition. Stephen E. Rushink, a resident patient at the facility, drove away in the vehicle and died when it left the road and struck a tree. P moved for summary judgment contending that there were no triable issues of fact since D violated subdivision (a) of section 1210 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and that the violation of the statute was the proximate cause of the occurrence. D also moved for summary judgment contending that the statute was not applicable. Both motions were denied. P and D appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner