Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

While P was mounting a tire on a rim P allegedly sustained serious and permanent injuries from an explosion resulting from the mismatching of the tire, manufactured by D, on the rim, manufactured by Budd (D). P seeks damages from Ds future lost wages, medical expenses, and disability. Ds contend that since P makes claims for future damages, P placed his life expectancy in issue. Ds learned that P was a former drug abuser. P admits to being bisexual and engaging in unprotected homosexual activity. P has never taken a blood test to determine his HIV status. Ds learned that P was a former drug abuser. P admits to being bisexual and engaging in unprotected homosexual activity. P has never taken a blood test to determine his HIV status. Ds filed a motion to compel a blood test from P. Ds argue that P placed his life expectancy in issue and it would not be prejudicial or burdensome to require P to take a blood test for HIV. P refused to submit voluntarily to a blood test citing his statutory and constitutional right to privacy claiming such a test will cause him to suffer unjust oppression, embarrassment, and annoyance. If P does not take the test, Ds want to preclude P from introducing evidence at trial of his life expectancy or future damages.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.