Sanchez v. State

749 N.E.2d 509 (2001)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D attended a birthday party. All nine people at the party were drinking and some were smoking marijuana. D was noticeably intoxicated after consuming between two and twenty-four beers and several glasses of tequila. He was asked to leave after he was accused of 'grabbing all the girls' butts.' D left and returned to the trailer with a gun. D held the four remaining occupants of the trailer hostage while he attempted to find a woman who had already left the party. D ordered one of the hostages to remove all of the telephones in the trailer, took the phones, and forced seventeen-year-old H.S. to leave with him. D and H.S. walked to a cornfield where D forced H.S. to remove her clothes and then raped her. When she complained that he was hurting her, D performed oral sex on her and then raped her several more times. The pair then walked three and one-half miles to D's house, hiding in ditches when cars passed. D took H.S. to the basement and again raped her. Both D and H.S. then fell asleep. Early that morning, the police arrived and found D asleep next to H.S. with a loaded weapon near his right hand and his left hand around H.S.'s neck. The trial court gave the following instruction: 'Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to the charge of Rape and Confinement. You may not take voluntary intoxication into consideration in determining whether the Defendant acted knowingly or intentionally, as alleged in the information.' D was convicted of rape and criminal confinement and was sentenced to forty years imprisonment. D appealed. D argues that it was error to give the voluntary intoxication instruction. The Court of Appeals found that D had provided no independent analysis supporting a due course of law claim under the Indiana Constitution, and therefore evaluated this issue under federal due process doctrine. It held that there was no federal due process violation. D appealed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.