Schmidt v. Breeden

517 S.E.2d 171 (1999)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Schmidt (P) was a six-year-old student enrolled in a voluntary after-school enrichment program operated and controlled by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (D). The Program was conducted between 2:00 and 6:00 P.M. each weekday afternoon. P was charged a thirty-five dollar ($35.00) per week enrollment fee participation in the Program. P suffered a head injury and no one from D told his mother. P suffered permanent brain and vision impairment. P filed suit and D moved for partial summary judgment. P asserted that the After-School Enrichment Program was a private daycare facility which operated and was located within a building owned by the D and D was not entitled to governmental immunity because operation of the Program constituted a proprietary function. The trial court denied Ds' motion. D appealed. Ds assert the trial court erred in that operation and control of the Program is a governmental function.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.