Schweiker v. Hansen

450 U.S. 785 (1981)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Hansen (P) met with Don Connelly, a field representative for the Social Security Administration and orally inquired if she was eligible for mother's insurance benefits. Connelly erroneously told P that she was not. P then left the SSA office without having filed a written application. Only written applications satisfy the filed application requirement of the act and the regulations that interpret the act. The SSA's Claims Manual, instructs field agents to advise applicants of the advantages of filing written applications and to recommend to those uncertain about eligibility to file. Connelly never followed those directions and did not recommend to P that she file a written application. P eventually filed an application and got the benefits. P then asked for the benefits to the date of her original meeting with Connelly based on principles of estoppel.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.