Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey

351 U.S. 427 (1956)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Mackey (P) sued Sears (D) presenting multiple claims for relief; breach of contract, unfair competition, and violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. On two of the claims, the trial court entered judgment for D. P appealed that decision and D opposed with a claim of lack of jurisdiction. The claims stated in Counts I and II were dismissed without leave to amend while the claims for Counts III and IV were left intact. P charged D with a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act causing P to lose $190,000 and under treble damages; $570,000. P appealed based on the final decision rule are argued that Rule 54(b) made an unauthorized extension of 28 USC 1291. The Seventh Circuit upheld jurisdiction.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.