Shanks v. Floom

124 N.E.2d 416 (1955)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

In 1925, Schiltz and Floom, pursuant to an oral agreement, constructed a cement driveway, seven feet wide and 110 feet long, between and on their two properties, each owner bearing one-half the cost. Both used the common driveway until the year 1948 when Schiltz sold his property to P. D inherited their property from William Floom, who died in that year. P sued D for an injunction prohibiting use. The court held for D in that the 'possession and use' of each owner was under a 'claim of right' and therefore adverse and this adverse possession continued for more than 21 years and therefore ripened into a prescriptive right. P Appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.