The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D is a wholesaler of fruit and produce. D was served with a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum, issued by the Price Administrator (D) under authority of the Emergency Price Control Act. D was to produce 'all duplicate sales invoices, sales books, ledgers, inventory records, contracts and records relating to the sale of all commodities from September 1, 1944, to September 28, 1944.' D appeared and, after being sworn, was requested to turn over the subpoenaed records. D produced the records but claimed constitutional privilege. D was eventually convicted of violating the Act. The Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the records which D was compelled to produce were records required to be kept by a valid regulation under the Price Control Act; that thereby they became public documents, as to which no constitutional privilege against self-incrimination attaches; that accordingly the immunity of § 202 (g) did not extend to the production of these records and the plea in bar was properly overruled by the trial court. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.