Sharpe v. Sharpe
366 P.3d 66 (2016)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
W is a Yup'ik Eskimo who was raised in Nome and has family ties to the native village of Stebbins. W was 'living in Anchorage, working at Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, and earning approximately $120,000 a year. Jyzuk (H) had primary physical custody, and W was ordered to pay $1,507 per month in child support. In April 2013, she left Anchorage and took up a subsistence lifestyle in Stebbins. H moved to modify the child support order. W alleged she was 'no longer employed,' that she was 'a full-time stay at home mother,' and that her only income was her annual Permanent Fund Dividend. W requested that the court reduce her monthly child support payment to $50 per month, the minimum allowed. H argued that W was 'voluntarily and unreasonably unemployed.' W expressed her desire to expose the parties' child to traditional life in Stebbins. And she said that living in Stebbins, a dry community, provided a reprieve from an alcohol abuse issue she had experienced during her marriage. The court denied W's motion. W appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner