D was convicted under an indictment charging three sales of narcotics. In 1951, Kalchinian, a government informer, met with D at a doctor's office where they were both being treated for narcotics addiction. Several accidental meetings followed as their paths crossed in their treatments. Finally, Kalchinian asked D if he knew how to score some drugs. At first, D tried to avoid the issue and not until a number of repetitions, predicated on Kalchinian's suffering, did D finally give in. Several times later, D got drugs and shared them with Kalchinian. Each time the total cost of the drugs to D was $25 and Kalchinian owed him $15; thus, they shared the expenses. After several such sales, Kalchinian informed the Bureau of Narcotics that he had another seller for them. On three occasions, government officials observed D giving drugs to Kalchinian for money. D was arrested, and the issue at trial was entrapment and whether D was already predisposed to commit the act and exhibited only the natural hesitancy of one acquainted with the narcotics trade. D was convicted. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.