A vehicle driven by Faggard, in which D was a passenger, collided with a vehicle driven by Robert Shinn, P's husband. Robert was killed in the accident, and P was seriously injured. On the day of the accident, Faggard picked D up to go and 'hang out.' D and Faggard were acquaintances, and both were under 21 years of age. An hour before the accident, Faggard decided to buy some beer. Faggard and D went to the convenience store where Faggard bought a twelve-pack of beer. D did not pay for the beer or arrange for the purchase of the beer. Faggard and D went to Faggard's house and talked and drank the beer. D consumed four or five beers, and Faggard consumed six or seven. D asked Faggard to take him home because his parents wanted him home by 7:00 p.m. to eat dinner. During the ride home, D did not think Faggard was speeding. The collision occurred. P sued D claiming that D had substantially assisted or encouraged an intoxicated Faggard to drive. D moved for summary judgment claiming he owed no duty to P. The motion was granted. P appealed under concert-of-action theory of liability.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.