Defendant's gambling debts were evidenced by a note from him to a closely held corporation in which he was an equal one-third shareholder. The alleged losses were sustained when the marriage had already deteriorated to the terminal level and the note was executed 10 days after the complaint for divorce was filed, the note has never been called and then D with full knowledge forged a joint tax return after such a return was ordered not to be done by the court.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.