Slocum (P) was shopping in Food Fair Stores (D). P inquired into the price of an item, and the clerk made a rude and malicious reply. The reply upset P mentally and allegedly caused a heart attack. P suffered from a pre-existing condition. P sought money damages for mental suffering or emotional distress and a heart attack from a preexisting condition caused by the abusive language of D's employee. P claimed that the language used in the comment was malicious and was used with the intent to inflict great emotional disturbance. The trial court dismissed the action for a failure to state a cause of action and P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.