Smith v. Durden

276 P.3d 943 (2012)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P, a former priest, brought this defamation action against Will Durden and William DeVries, St. Francis Vestry members, and Denise Durden and Marion DeVries, members of the parish (Ds). P initiated this defamation action after the publication of a packet of documents which, among other things, alluded to alleged sexual misconduct involving P and minor parishioners. One of the documents was an anonymous letter accusing P of several acts of pedophilia. P disclosed a summary of the allegations to the congregation during a Sunday service. One or more Ds offered to make copies of the packet for inquiring parishioners. Ds moved for summary judgment on the ground that P failed to demonstrate that he had suffered any actual injury to his reputation as a result of the publication of the material by its distribution. P claims that personal humiliation and mental anguish qualified as the requisite actual injury. The court granted Ds' motion. P appealed. The Court of Appeals agreed with P that evidence of mental anguish and humiliation is sufficient to establish actual injury for liability purposes. Ds appealed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.