Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc.

52 F.3d 867 (10th Cir. 1995)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P developed a fiberglass heating pad for newborn hogs. He presented these ideas in a letter to the president of First State Bank in Osborne, Kansas. Osborne community leaders subsequently created D to manufacture P's products. Thibault moved to Osborne to become president of D. P agreed to allow D to manufacture the products he had developed in exchange for royalties on sales. P became an employee of D. P learned of D's plan to develop a trademark, he insisted that D use the word 'Stanfield' in its mark. D agreed and they entered into a written agreement. Two trademarks were designed. One mark consisted of the word 'Stanfield'; the other mark was a circle design incorporating the word 'Stanfield.' D used both trademarks. D applied for registration of these trademarks in March 1977. They were registered on January 24, 1978. P had become ill and resigned on September 23, 1975. The Patent and Trademark Office rejected P’s application for a patent on the hog heating pad. D stopped paying royalties to P on the sale of heating pads in December 1976. P sued D claiming that D had breached the 1973 agreement by discontinuing the payment of royalties. P alleged that D's use of the word 'Stanfield' was conditioned upon the payment of royalties. The Kansas Supreme Court ultimately overturned a verdict in favor of P. D informed P that D considered the July 1975 agreement a release of plaintiff's rights in the word 'Stanfield,' and that D had registered its 'Stanfield' trademark. D used its trademarks in commerce since 1976. In 1983, D filed declarations with the Patent and Trademark Office to obtain incontestability status. In September 1991, P requested that D discontinue use of the Stanfield trademark because the 15-year license agreement had expired. D refused and P sued claiming that D fraudulently procured the registration of the trademark. D was granted summary judgment and P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.