The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

A fire started in a shed owned by D. It spread to other properties in the area. Eventually, over 50 separate actions for damages were filed against D to recover losses from a fire. Three of the actions proceeded separately through trial to final judgment; a judgment was awarded in favor of D, and the other two judgments went to the claimants. State Farm (P) stored some of its property in a warehouse just sixty feet from D’s shed, and the fire destroyed P’s property. P, and other parties, who was not a party to any of the previous actions, sought to utilize the prior claimants' judgments to establish D's negligence and its responsibility for any losses caused by the fire. Ps all filed amended complaints to match the cases in which D was found to be negligent. D, of course, asserted that it had a favorable ruling in one of the cases. The trial court held that D was collaterally estopped from any further contesting its liability.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.