State v. Brooks
116 N.M. 309 (1993)
Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs
Facts
Brooks (D) was a bookkeeper for RMS, a property management service. Sometime in August 1989, it was discovered that $3,000 in rental monies was missing. A private investigator was hired. D acknowledged taking the money and even wrote a confession to that effect. D moved for a directed verdict because the State failed to prove that D was entrusted with the tenants' rent money; that was denied. D was convicted of embezzlement and appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner