State v. Crawford

861 P.2d 791 (1993)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D owed money to Bateman for cocaine, Bateman wanted D to commit some robberies in Topeka in order to get money. Bateman's girlfriend gave D a gun. They stopped at the Ramada Inn. Then Bateman drove D to a hospital. When Overholt came out of the hospital, Bateman told D to rob her. D approached her and pointed the gun at her. She grabbed the barrel of the gun, and the two struggled. D hit her with the butt of it. D got her wedding rings, and, when she could not get her other ring off, D hit her again with the butt of the gun. Overholt spent three days in the hospital. D then approached Monhollon, and put the gun in Monhollon's ribs, and told him it was a big gun which would 'put a big hole in a big man.' Monhollon got into the driver's seat of his car. D got in behind him. D told him to drive to his residence. At the house, Monhollon was told to lie face down on the floor. D took Monhollon's ring and the cash from his pockets. Monhollon crawled from room to room with D opening storage areas and drawers and pulling or dumping out the contents. D then changed into Monhollon's clothes and shoes and ate and drank Monhollon's food and soft drinks. At gunpoint, D took Monhollon to the back door of the other half of his duplex and instructed him to say his phone was not working. The neighbor, Looka, let him in and D went through Looka's jewelry and dresser drawers. D told Looka to take off her clothes, and he handcuffed her to the faucet in the bathroom. D then ate Looka's ice cream and cookies. With D driving, they set out to find an automatic bank teller machine to use the bank card D had taken from Monhollon's wallet. D then pulled into a residential driveway. After they got inside, Kinney, who had been outside, came into her garage. D pointed the gun at her. When Kinney screamed and tried to run away, D struck her with the gun, and she lost consciousness. After she awoke, D went through the house for money, jewelry, and guns. Monhollon was told to carry the television out to the car. At gunpoint, D gave him the bank card and told him to withdraw his money. Monhollon gave D the money. Bateman was not satisfied with the take and threatened to hurt him and his son if he did not get more. D was instructed to wait until after midnight and then rob the Holidome. Monhollon escaped from the trunk. Police found D underneath a table in the restaurant of the Holidome. D claimed he was totally under the control of Bateman. An expert testified that D suffered from chronic drug dependence and use chronic depression, battered person syndrome and depression arising from it, and an extremely dependent personality disorder. He was of the opinion that D committed the crimes at issue 'under the fear' of Bateman. D was convicted and appealed contesting the following line in a jury instruction: a threat of future injury is not enough, particularly after danger from the threat has passed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.