State v. Exxon Mobile Corp.

126 A.3d 266 (2015)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

In 1990, Congress amended the Federal Clean Air Act to require the use of an “oxygenate” in gasoline in areas not meeting certain national air quality standards. Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was one among several possible oxygenates. Between 1995 and 2006, gasoline with MTBE was sold throughout the New Hampshire (P). In 1997, P became aware that MTBE could pose increased risks to groundwater. In 2004, P enacted legislation banning MTBE gasoline effective in 2007. In 2005, Congress eliminated the oxygenate requirement and enacted a renewable fuels mandate to increase ethanol usage. In 2003, P sued several gasoline suppliers, refiners, and chemical manufacturers seeking damages for groundwater contamination allegedly caused by MTBE. All defendants except D settled. The jury found in favor of P on all of its claims. The jury rejected D's defenses. The trial court entered a verdict of $236,372,644 against D. D appealed. In part, D claimed market share liability is not an acceptable theory of recovery.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.