State v. Schminkey
597 N.W.2d 785 (1999)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D spent the evening of May 17, 1997 drinking so much, so he had no recollection of leaving a bar or of what happened after he left. Witnesses have established that D departed the bar and then drove a pickup owned by Dale Kimm, a man D did not know. Schminkey did not have Kimm's permission to drive the pickup. P was without doubt driving drunk and at an excessive speed. D went through an intersection without slowing down and struck two vehicles, that were stopped at the intersection stop sign. Nineteen-year-old Jason Kray died en route to the hospital. D accelerated away from the accident and crashed into a fence a block away. D smelled strongly of alcohol. A urine test showed his blood-alcohol level to be .189, significantly over the legal limit of .10. D was charged with homicide by vehicle, involuntary manslaughter, and theft of a motor vehicle. D claimed he was unable to recall the events of the evening due to his intoxication. D entered an Alford plea to the theft and homicide charges. P dismissed the manslaughter charge as part of the plea deal. D was sentenced to consecutive ten-year and five-year terms. D appealed claiming his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. D, in part, contends there was no a factual basis for a finding that he intended to permanently deprive the owner of his vehicle. The court of appeals affirmed. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner