The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

While camping, Sety (D) was approached by Cue, who was intoxicated. Cue told D that he had killed several people with his knife. Cue shot his rifle across a nearby river and subsequently pointed a gun at D's head, joking about the fact that D was scared. D his gun and fired several warning shots at Cue. D told Cue to freeze but when Cue reached inside his jacket D shot him and made a citizen's arrest. D lead Cue toward a dam keepers' house. Cue attempted to flee, and D shot him. D approached Cue and Cue grabbed him. D then choked Cue and escaped his grasp. D reloaded his pistol and continued to take Cue to the house. Cue began running, and D shot him again. As D approached Cue, his gun went off by accident and put a bullet in Cue's head, killing him. D was charged and tried for murder. D's testimony surrounding the fatal shot was in conflict with the physical evidence. All the physical evidence indicated that D shot Cue from a short distance. D was convicted of second-degree murder which was reduced by the court to voluntary manslaughter. D appealed; the evidence showed he acted in fear for his life, and, therefore, he was innocent of all charges. The State (P) appealed the reduction to manslaughter; D's use of a deadly weapon established malice which required a murder conviction.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.