This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Stepniewski (D) was convicted of violating a Wisconsin statute. That statute made it a criminal offense for any person to intentionally refuse, neglect, or fail to obey home improvement contractor regulations. D was convicted on 12 counts. The state court upheld the convictions. The Wisconsin Supreme Court had previously interpreted the statute as a strict liability law without an intent element. D sought a writ of habeas corpus in federal court; the absence of an intent element violated due process. The federal court issued the writ. The issuance of the writ was appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.