Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

During the summer months of 1948, 1949, and 1950, Charles was employed by a crop spraying business in northeast Montana. Sternhagen (P) claims that during that time, Charles Sternhagen was exposed to the herbicide, 2,4-D. In 1981, Charles, a medical doctor specializing in radiology, was diagnosed as having a form of cancer which P claims was caused by his exposure to the herbicide 2,4-D during the years 1948 through 1950. Dow (Ds) dispute the claim that there is a causal link between the herbicide 2,4-D and the type of cancer from which Charles died. Ds claim neither they nor medical science, knew or had reason to know of any alleged cancer-causing properties of the herbicide 2,4-D during the years 1948 through 1950. P seeks recovery under the doctrine of strict liability in tort for injuries and damages allegedly sustained as a result of Charles' exposure to the herbicide 2,4-D during the years 1948 through 1950. The court certified a question.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.