Stroud v. Cook

931 F.Supp. 733 (1996)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

This action arises out of a collision between two cars driven by Stroud (P) and D and a secondary collision with another car driven by Tinsley (D1), defendant and cross-defendant. D was cited by an officer of the Nevada State Highway Patrol for failing to use due care in violation of 484.363. D was found guilty and fined $35. The statute is a criminal statute and P seeks to offer the conviction as evidence of D’s negligence.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.