Chilmark, a Martha's Vineyard community, adopted an ordinance that limited the issuance of building permits for residential construction to one-tenth of the lots in a subdivision in the year the lots are subdivided and a further one-tenth of those lots in each of the subsequent nine years. Sturges (P) sued on grounds that Chilmark (D) lacked statutory authority for such a law and that the law was unconstitutional. The trial judge ruled that the rate of development by-law was unconstitutional. This appeal resulted.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.