The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Eliscu (D) contracted with Harms (P) to use his copyright on a number of songs composed for a motion picture in 1933. P contends that D assigned his rights to certain songs to Dreyfus and that P was the successor in interest to this assignment of the rights. D denied the assignment and claims that the copyrights were properly renewed and were assigned to a Jungnickel (D1) thirty years after the alleged assignment to Dreyfus. When the contract came up for renewal, there was an argument and D brought an action in state court for declaratory relief of his rights under the contract. P brought an action in district court to determine the ownership rights to the copyright under 28 USC 1338. D's motion to dismiss the action in federal court was granted; title to the copyright was a matter of state rather than federal law. The federal court had no jurisdiction. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.