Texaco Refining And Marketing, Inc. v. Samowitz

570 A.2d 170 (Conn. 1990)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

In 1964, Texaco (P) executed a lease for property for 15 years subject to renewal by the lessee, for three additional five-year periods. The lease granted P the exclusive right to purchase the demised premises at any time during the term of the lease or an extension or renewal thereof, from and after the 14th year of the initial term for the sum of $125,000. Samowitz was the successor in interest in the lease. In 1987, P wanted to exercise the option to buy. D refused to honor the option. P sued for specific performance. The trial court ruled that the option did not violate the rule against perpetuities and found for P. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.