The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The Daniel Ball was a steamer only conducting its business between Grand Rapids and Grand Haven; all within the state of Michigan. A Congressional Act of 1838 made it unlawful to operate steamships on the bays, lakes, rivers, or other navigable waters of the United States without a license. The Daniel Ball did not have a license under U.S. law and was fined $500. The Government sued to recover that fine. The United States (P) sued, and the owners asserted that the ship was not subject to the license requirement because the Grand River was not a navigable water and the ship did not engage in interstate commerce. The District Court dismissed the case, but the Circuit Court reversed. The Supreme Court granted review.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.