The Italian Fisherman (D) entered into a 25-year ground lease with Middlemas (P). D took possession and built a $175,000 restaurant on the property. A year later, D sold the business to Armand for $335,000. P assented to an assignment of the lease, but it was made clear that D was not relieved of its responsibilities under the lease. D then executed a security agreement on all of the assets of Armand's business. P was unaware of this agreement. Things went south for Armand 8 years later, and Armand desired to sell the business, but D declined its consent. Armand sued D seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, and D countersued for enforcement of the security agreement. Armand defaulted on rent and taxes, and D was not notified. D did, however, send P checks for both real estate taxes and October rent. D also eventually sent a rent check for November when it discovered that Armand had not paid November's rent. P delivered a lease termination notice to Armand and D. D's checks were rejected by P and returned on December 12, 1984. P then filed suit in January 1985 against Armand. Armand did not answer, but D was allowed to intervene. The trial court ruled that D was merely a creditor of Armand and had no right title and interest in the reversion of the lease. P was given possession and D appealed. The Circuit Court affirmed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.