Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P contracted with D to purchase wood flooring for the total price of $15,124.69, which P paid in full. D was unable to deliver the flooring. P canceled the order and contracted to purchase comparable flooring from a different supplier who had it in stock, at a cost of $19,166.25. P sued D for the breach. The Supreme Court granted P's motion for summary judgment to the extent of recovering the purchase price of $15,124.69 but denied the motion as to recover the additional costs of obtaining replacement goods. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.