P contracted with D to purchase wood flooring for the total price of $15,124.69, which P paid in full. D was unable to deliver the flooring. P canceled the order and contracted to purchase comparable flooring from a different supplier who had it in stock, at a cost of $19,166.25. P sued D for the breach. The Supreme Court granted P's motion for summary judgment to the extent of recovering the purchase price of $15,124.69 but denied the motion as to recover the additional costs of obtaining replacement goods. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.