Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

In 1968, Traudt (P) and Nebraska (D) entered into an agreement for D to purchase an easement across P’s land. P alleges that as part of the negotiations for the easement, D promised P that if any other landowner gets more money, then you would get more money. That statement was made orally and was not put in writing. P also alleges that they interpreted the words ‘other landowners’ to mean persons who own land in Hamilton County from whom D had purchased easements. P also alleges that D acquired land from another party by eminent domain, which was finally determined in 1972. By virtue of the price on that easement, P claims that D owes him $16,000 extra for the easement. The trial court dismissed the action on a demurrer from D and P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.