The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

After the end of D's case and before the jury began deliberations, the judge instructed the jurors that they could draw an unfavorable inference against D from his failure to testify. He was convicted and appealed. D challenged the conviction in that the jury instruction was improper under Due Process and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.