This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

A record was developed, and subsequently there was a two-year lag in the actual decision. During this time, T-Bills fell 4.09 points. The Commission then reduced the equity rate of return by the same amount and later in response to Union’s arguments for a rehearing modified the T-Bill rate from 7.33 to 7.77 and reduced the adjustment to 3.65 points. The Commission then approved a rate that was substantially different from what was initially found. Union contends that the use of the T-bill data violated 556(e) and Due Process.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.