Defendant was convicted in the district court for conspiracy to rob a postal truck and of aiding and abetting the robbery of a postal truck. D appealed in part based on the exclusion of a sworn statement containing fabrications by government witness Quiles and of other documents giving false descriptions of 'robbers' provided by Quiles.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.