Bailey (D) was charged with robbing a bank. The government (P) introduced his accomplice's (Stewart's) confession. Stewart had plea-bargained with FBI agents. The only fact that corroborated this statement was other evidence about the type of car that they allegedly used. D was convicted and appealed. D claimed that the statement should not have been admitted under the residual hearsay exception.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.