Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D served as Sheriff of Orange County. D received financial support from Donald Haidl. Haidl testified at trial that D 'offered [him] the complete power of the sheriff's department for raising money and supporting him.' After Carona took office, Haidl continued to make payments to Carona. Haidl offered D and Assistant Sheriff George Jamarillo each a 'bribe not to take bribes' in the amount of $1000 per month, which they accepted. Haidl gave D a speedboat in 2001, which they concealed through a sham transaction. The federal government began an investigation. Haidl admitted his own criminal misconduct and signed a cooperation plea agreement with the government. Government attorneys instructed Haidl to meet with D and to make surreptitious recordings of their meetings. D was represented by attorney Dean Stewart, who had notified the government that he was representing D. P got desperate and equipped Haidl with two fake 'subpoena attachments' that identified certain records that Haidl was to tell D he had been subpoenaed to produce. These documents referred to cash payments Haidl provided to D and to the sham transaction they used to conceal the gift of the speedboat. In the next meeting, D made statements that suggested both that he had received payments and gifts from Haidl and that he wanted Haidl to lie to the grand jury about these transactions. D was charged with tampering with a grand jury witness. D moved before trial to suppress his statements to Haidl because they allegedly were obtained in violation of Rule 2-100 which prohibits an attorney from 'communicating directly or indirectly with a party [the attorney] knows to be represented by another lawyer.' The district court held that the prosecutors had violated Rule 2-100, but the court declined to suppress the evidence. The jury acquitted D on everything but the witness tampering. D moved for an arrest of judgment and a judgment of acquittal. The district court denied the motion. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.